seriously, the guy has a point

This was a fascinating read. I had no idea the Charging Bull statue was an uncommissioned guerrilla artwork. I always assumed an investment firm or trade group had commissioned it, but the New York Stock Exchange actually had the New York Police Department impound the statute when it first appeared outside their building. I also didn’t know the Fearless Girl statue was commissioned by an investment firm as a bit of guerrilla marketing. But I can understand why Charging Bull’s artist doesn’t like Fearless Girl: it changes his symbol of power and strength into a symbol of oppression, all to sell somebody’s stock portfolio. I also find it ironic that the company behind Fearless Girl would turn a symbol of “strength in the market” into a symbol of oppression when the product they sell their clients is strength in the market. Maybe a more apt placement would be to put the Fearless Girl next to the bull, facing in the same direction, as though she was directing the Charging Bull. That would probably square better with what State Street Global is selling, and it would return Charging Bull to a symbol of strength, not oppression.

gregfallis.com

I got metaphorically spanked a couple of days ago. Folks have been talking about the Fearless Girl statue ever since it was dropped in Manhattan’s Financial District some five weeks ago.I have occasionally added a comment or two to some of the online discussions about the statue.

Recently most of the Fearless Girldiscussions have focused on the complaints by Arturo Di Modica, the sculptor who createdCharging Bull. He wantsFearless Girl removed, and that boy is taking a metric ton of shit for saying that. Here’s what I said that got me spanked:

The guy has a point.

This happened in maybe three different discussions over the last week or so. In each case I explained briefly why I believe Di Modica has a point (and I’ll explain it again in a bit), and for the most part folks either accepted my comments or ignored them. Which…

View original post 1,090 more words

The sweetness of honey

I’m not usually one to pay much attention to decorating, but I think this honeycomb pattern my friend Morgan put up in her house is really cool!

Patchwork Aplenty

Blueberry season is winding down and life as I formerly knew it is beginning to resume. Which of course means cleaning again, because I’ve been neglecting pretty much everything other than making sure I have clean clothes for the next day. But it also means long hours equals a little extra spending cash and I’ve been working on home decorating!

Yesterday I received my honeycomb prints from CG Home I found on Etsy and I couldn’t wait to put them up. Check them out, they have amazing vinyl decals at a good price and quick shipping (all the way from Poland!) And I won’t go into too much detail because the final result speaks for itself. It turned out to be exactly what I envisioned!

IMG_5908

They were so easy to put up, it makes me want to put decals on all my walls, but for for now I’ll keep to…

View original post 55 more words

The Ages of the Founding Fathers

We tend to think of America’s Founding Fathers as all being old men, but some of them were definitely on the young side. Todd Andrlik took the trouble to compile a list of how old various players on both sides of the American Revolution were when the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776. While Ben Franklin was 70 and Samuel Adams was 53, George Washington was only 44 and John Adams was just 40. King George Ⅲ was just 38. The youngest signers of the Declaration of Independence appear to have been just 26 years old: Thomas Lynch, Jr. and Edward Rutledge, although the list doesn’t indicate whether or not they actually signed on July 4, 1776 or were among some of the people who added their names later. Still, our perspectives seemed to have been shaped by how these men looked when their portraits were painted years later, not how they looked during the Revolution.